The Approach
Health isn't a sprint.
It's a journey.
Most platforms run an infinite stream — log forever, score forever, never finish anything. We structure the journey as a series of cycles: understand where you are, match to what will move the needle, implement, re-evaluate. Cycle 1 enters through Baseline. Every cycle after enters through a Checkpoint that becomes the new starting line — each loop sharper than the last.
Step 01 · Baseline
Start with the whole picture.
Baseline is the cycle-1-only entry point — the one time the patient walks through full onboarding. Behavioral baselines across all seven pillars, lab panels and biometrics entered by the clinical team. Four layers of data feed one starting picture: behaviors, biomarkers, biometrics, and what the patient learns along the way. From cycle 2 forward, Checkpoint takes this role — refreshing baselines from the prior cycle's tracked data (weighted to recent weeks) so the picture only gets more accurate over time.
- Four data layers — behaviors, biomarkers, biometrics, education — roll into one starting picture
- Patient owns baselines during onboarding; clinical team owns lab values and biometrics
- Cycle 1 only — every cycle after enters through Checkpoint, with refreshed baselines
Sarah Chen
52F · Pre-menopausal · Cycle 1 · Goal-setting
Key Baselines
Ultra-Processed Food %
Nutrition · target ≤10%
30%
Daily Fiber
Nutrition · target ≥30 g
12 g
Strength Training
Movement · target 3× / wk
1× / week
+14 more behaviors · 28 biomarkers · 9 biometrics
What we track
The depth behind that starting picture.
Every layer has its own taxonomy, its own scoring methodology, and its own evidence base. Explore any of them.
Biomarkers
59 markers · 10 categories
Blood biomarkers scored against longevity-focused optimal ranges — not just lab reference. Patterns surface across related markers; trends tracked over cycles.
Explore the panel
Biometrics
Body composition · vitals
Body composition, vitals, and derived measurements tuned to cohort — ranges shift with age, sex, athlete status, comorbidities. Clinician-entered or synced from connected devices.
Explore the panel
Behaviors
7 pillars · 100+ tracked
Nutrition, movement, sleep, stress, cognitive, connection, and core care — each pillar broken into specific behaviors a patient can actually track and a clinician can actually reason about.
Step 02 · Score
Scored for the patient, not the average.
A number on a chart is just a number. What it actually means depends on who you are. Every value — behavioral, biomarker, biometric — gets read against patient-specific ranges tuned to age, sex, cycle stage, athlete status, and comorbidities. A 26 kg dominant-hand grip lands as In Range for a 52F at 75/100; the same 26 kg reads as Out of Range for a 52M (31/100) and Optimal for a 75F (100/100). Same scale, different lens — applied consistently so every score is comparable.
- Patient-specific ranges, not one-size-fits-all thresholds
- The same scale across behavioral, biomarker, and biometric data — so apples-to-apples
- Every range is published with the evidence behind it
Biometric
Grip Strength · Dominant Hand
Range tuned for 52F · pre-menopausal
Value
26kg
In Range · 75/100
Same 26 kg · Different patient
Step 03 · Match
Rank the recommendations
by clinical impact.
The system surfaces a curated set of evidence-backed recommendations — ranked specifically for Sarah. Each rec's clinical-impact score blends three signals: how much the underlying behavior moves the connected markers, how big her gap is on those markers, and how poorly she's currently scoring on the related behavior. The target is structured as a multi-week ramp the clinician can edit before push.
- Every recommendation tied to published clinical evidence with PMIDs on the card
- Multi-week ramped targets — never go-to-optimal-on-day-one
- Clinician-in-the-loop: edit targets, swap recs, approve before anything reaches the patient
Reduce Ultra-Processed Foods
Clinical Impact
53 markers affected · ApoB primary
Behavioral Score
Meal Patterns
Target
EditFor Sarah
- •Ultra-processed % at 30% — primary driver of meal-pattern score
- •HbA1c 5.8 + ApoB 105 → outsized leverage from this lever
- •3-week ramp matches her stated change-pace preference
Step 04 · Sequence
Build the plan to actually stick.
Recommendations alone aren't a plan — sequencing is. WellPath bakes behavioral science into the plan structure itself: ramps move targets gradually toward optimal, delayed-start fields hold add-ins until the foundation is built, and a backup pool stays parked so a clinician can promote an alternate without rebuilding. Each cycle suggests a coherent twelve-week shape, then the clinician edits and approves before push.
- Multi-week ramps move targets toward optimal at a rate the patient can sustain
- Add-ins stack in at week 4, 7, or 9 — only once the foundation is stable
- Backup options stay parked so a clinician can promote an alternate without rebuilding the plan
Chiron's Suggested Plan
12-week cycle5 active · 2 stack in week 9 · 3 backup options
Active
Stacking In
Backup Options
Ramps + delayed-start sequence behaviors so Sarah builds the foundation first. Stack-ins arrive when her adherence signal confirms she has the bandwidth.
Step 05 · Active Phase
Where the plan meets the day.
A plan is only as good as the rate at which the patient executes it. The active phase is where the clinician's structure becomes the patient's daily field of view — twelve weeks lived one day at a time, by default. The duration is adjustable shorter or longer to fit the patient. Each morning opens with a brief that uses yesterday's data to focus today's three priorities, with friction-free tracking, education at the moment of need, three calibrated challenge types, and Chiron grounded in the active plan.
- Twelve-week default · adjustable shorter or longer per patient
- Morning brief: 90% data-driven, 10% AI — focuses today on what matters most
- Challenges calibrated to where adherence actually is — push, expand, or stack
- Chiron, education, and week-in-review surface in context, not buried in settings
Goals
71
Weekly Adherence
88% still achievable
View goals ›
Coach
All caught up
Challenges
3 recommended waiting for you
Step 06 · Checkpoint
Look back. Build forward.
Checkpoint isn't the end of a cycle — it IS the start of the next one. It generates a structured retrospective on the cycle that just wrapped (marker movement, adherence pattern, bio-age delta — patient and clinician see the same view), then refreshes baselines from the data the patient actually logged. The clinical-impact ranking learns from observed outcomes, priority shifts get folded in, what stuck carries forward, what didn't gets re-thought. Cycle 1 enters through Baseline; every cycle from 2 onward enters through Checkpoint — each one a sharper starting line than the last.
- Replaces Baseline as the cycle-entry point from cycle 2 onward
- Adherence pattern feeds challenge selection next cycle
- Observed marker deltas refine the clinical-impact ranking — literature gives way to evidence in our own cohort
- Each cycle starts with more signal than the last
Markers Affected
18 improved · 31 stable · 4 declined · ranked by score delta
Feeding cycle 2
- Baselines refreshed from tracked data (weighted to recent weeks)
- Adherence pattern: AM goals 92%, weekend tracking gaps
- Sarah's next-cycle priority: strength gains over endurance
Transparency
Every score has a methodology. Every range has a citation.
Every recommendation has evidence attached.
No black box. Clinicians can drill into how any score was calculated, which studies a recommendation references, and what the relevant ranges are for their specific patient. The methodology evolves; the audit trail doesn't go away.